Lawmakers Urge Trump to Submit Iran Deal for Congressional Review

Date

Spread the love

Arabic version: المشرعون يحثون ترامب على تقديم اتفاق إيران للمراجعة من قبل الكونغرس

According to Al Jazeera,

Lawmakers and pro-Israel groups have issued calls for United States President Donald Trump to ask Congress to review a recent memorandum of understanding (MoU) designed to end the US-Israeli war with Iran. They cite the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA) as a precedent. Passed in 2015, the law says any agreements with Iran related to its nuclear programme must be submitted to Congress for review and a possible vote of disapproval.

US Senator Lindsey Graham was among the first lawmakers to invoke the act after this week’s memo was announced. “Under our law, any nuclear deal with Iran will be sent to Congress for review and a vote. I look forward to reviewing the final product,” Graham, a longtime Iran hawk, wrote in a social media post on Sunday.

Critics, including some Democrats and pro-peace groups, have questioned the newfound interest in Congress asserting its powers, after Republicans repeatedly flouted the legislature’s authority during the war itself. Some see the push as an effort to give the memorandum greater legitimacy, as Trump comes under fire for its terms. Others question whether Iran hawks are invoking INARA to push for a return to war.

The MoU opens the Strait of Hormuz, lifts the US blockade on Iran’s ports, and halts fighting on all fronts, including in Lebanon. It also immediately lifts US sanctions on Iran’s fossil fuel industry, while launching negotiations on the future of Iran’s nuclear programme, among other issues. As part of the deal, both countries agree to maintain their nuclear “status quo” during ongoing negotiations, and Iran commits to diluting its highly enriched uranium “on site”, with details to be determined during the negotiations.

While Trump has yet to acknowledge INARA’s authority, legal experts from across the ideological spectrum have argued that his memorandum is subject to the law. Tess Bridgeman, a legal adviser for the Obama White House, wrote that the law applies to “this new MoU, and any future final agreement that might be negotiated in the coming months.”

Still, he anticipates that neither Congress nor the judicial branch will confront Trump over the issue. Trump’s second term has been defined by a broad interpretation of presidential power. His administration has previously flouted the US Constitution’s provision that Congress alone has the power to declare war. Trump has maintained that Iran represented an “imminent threat” to the US, which allowed him to launch defensive strikes without congressional approval.

As the debate continues, it remains uncertain whether Trump will comply with the legal requirements set forth by INARA. His administration has often bypassed congressional authority, raising questions about the future of US-Iran diplomacy and the potential implications for legislative oversight.

About the Author

More
articles