24 April, 2024
Search
Close this search box.
Jury deliberates on verdict in Lehrmann trial

Date

Spread the love

A jury will enter its third day on Monday of deliberating a verdict in the trial of the man accused of raping Brittany Higgins.

Former Liberal Party staffer Bruce Lehrmann has pleaded not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and is facing a criminal trial in the ACT Supreme Court.

The jury retired last week after the prosecution closed its case following a 12-day trial.

Chief Justice Lucy McCallum instructed the jurors to find their verdict according to the evidence presented in the courtroom.

She reminded them Mr Lehrmann was presumed innocent and it was up to the prosecution to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ms Higgins alleges Mr Lehrmann raped her inside a ministerial office in Parliament House following a night out drinking with colleagues. He denies any sexual interaction happened.

In his closing argument, Prosecutor Shane Drumgold urged the jury to disregard discussions of political movements and workplace cultures sparked by the case.

He said the case was not about the culture inside Parliament House or the Me Too movement but about what happened on a couch inside a minister’s office early on Saturday, March 23, 2019.

Mr Drumgold said Ms Higgins had been a credible and honest witness whose version of events that night had not wavered.

Meanwhile, he said Mr Lehrmann had given inconsistent accounts about why he was at parliament on the night of the alleged assault to the security guards, to his boss and to the police.

The prosecutor suggested Mr Lehrmann’s intent was to go to Parliament House so he could be alone with the “drunk” and “vulnerable” Ms Higgins.

Mr Lehrmann’s defence lawyer Steven Whybrow told the court nothing happened that night and suggested Ms Higgins had fabricated her account to save her job.

He said a closer look at her evidence made the prosecution’s case against his client “totally untenable”.

Mr Whybrow pointed to inconsistencies in Ms Higgins’ story, including that she had told police and others she had attended doctor appointments after the alleged assault.

He suggested Ms Higgins fabricated doctor appointments at the time to “make it more believable” that she had been sexually assaulted.

The jury must continue deliberations until they reach a unanimous verdict.

1800 RESPECT 1800 737 732

Lifeline 131 114

-AAP

The post Jury deliberates on verdict in Lehrmann trial appeared first on The New Daily.

More
articles