Arabic version: المحكمة العليا تحد من سلطات ترامب في فرض الرسوم الجمركية في حكم تاريخي

The Supreme Court has issued a ruling that restricts the ability of U.S. presidents to impose tariffs unilaterally, a decision that could significantly impact Donald Trump’s trade policies. This ruling comes after two decades of the court deferring to executive authority, which has raised concerns over the potential for corruption in tariff applications.

According to The Guardian, the court’s decision is a long-overdue warning, making it more difficult for any president to use tariffs as a political tool that favors specific companies or individuals. The ruling specifically states that presidents must have clear congressional authorization to impose tariffs, rejecting Trump’s previous assertions of broad powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

Under Trump’s administration, tariffs have been criticized for benefiting political allies and donors. Numerous examples have surfaced where companies receiving tariff exemptions had financial ties to Trump or his campaign. For instance, Apple and Tesla reportedly secured favorable treatment after contributing significant funds to Trump’s inauguration and campaign efforts.

The Supreme Court ruling does not eliminate Trump’s ability to impose tariffs but requires him to adhere to stricter guidelines under existing laws. The Trade Act of 1974, which he must now rely on, imposes limitations on the scope and duration of tariffs, aiming for broader and more uniform applications rather than targeted exemptions for donors.

This legal shift may alter the landscape of corporate lobbying and influence in Washington, as larger corporations have previously opted to remain silent against Trump’s policies for fear of retaliation. With the court’s decision, the dynamics around tariff imposition and corporate influence could begin to change, potentially leading to a more equitable trade policy landscape.